‘SHARIA’ AUSTRIA: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff found guilty of ‘Denigration of Religious Teachings’ for telling the truth about Islam
Posted: December 23, 2011 Filed under: Islamization of the West Leave a comment »
Freedom of speech no longer exists in Austria, as definitively proven by the Vienna high court. This week, a judge upheld the conviction against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff on the following charge: “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion.” In simplest terms, this means that in Austria, as in other nations across the Western world currently transitioning to Sharia (Islamic law), speaking the truth about Islam is not tolerated, and, more and more, is against the law.
WND (H/T Maria) Elisabeth was convicted in February 2011 of “denigration” of Islam because in the course of a seminar she was teaching on Islam she stated that “Muhammad had a thing for little girls.”
This statement is demonstrably true. According to an authoritative Islamic text (hadith), Muhammad married his wife, Aisha, when she was six years old. According to the same hadith, Muhammad engaged in sexual intercourse with his “wife” when she was nine. This, at the very least, constitutes “a thing” for little girls. It also constitutes child rape under Western law and Judeo-Christian-derived morality. In all too many Islamic societies where Muhammad’s example is emulated, such child rape in “wedlock” is not a crime; indeed, it is permissible under Sharia.
In fact, the court didn’t contest this. In both Elisabeth’s initial trial and her recent appeal, the factual basis of her statement didn’t come under judicial attack. Elisabeth is right, and the court knows it. What the Vienna court has twice defined now as being outside the law of Austria is the negative opinion her remark conveyed regarding Muhammad’s record of deviance from Western traditions forbidding sexual intercourse with children. It is wrong, according to the Austrian court, to look down on sex with children if the alleged perp, centuries ago, was the Islamic prophet.
It is literally against Islamic law to criticize or expose Islam or its prophet (Muhammad) in any adverse way. This prohibition against freedom of conscience is now part of Austrian law as well. That the verdict upheld against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff actually imperils the most innocent and vulnerable among us – little girls whose molestation the courts have implicitly excused as a religious rite – only underscores the depravity of the Vienna high court.
TURKEY outraged over French Parliament bill that penalizes denial of the Armenian Christian Genocide by Ottoman Turks in WWI
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: Religion of Hate Leave a comment »
KUDOS TO FRANCE: It’s about time somebody called the Turkish Muslim genocide against 1.5 million Armenian Christians what it is: ‘GENOCIDE’
Todays Zaman France took the first step on Thursday to criminalizing the denial of genocide, including the 1915 mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks, prompting Ankara to recall its ambassador for consultations.
The approval of a bill by French Parliament that penalized denial of “Armenian genocide” in France has drawn strong
condemnation from both the Turkish government and the opposition.
Despite strong protests by Turkey, French lawmakers in the National Assembly — the lower house of Parliament — voted overwhelmingly in favor of the bill, which will now be debated next year in the Senate. The bill makes denial of the alleged Armenian genocide a crime punishable by a one-year prison sentence and a fine of 45,000 euros.
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan called Wednesday on President Nicolas Sarkozy’s rival, the Socialist Party, to re-evaluate the step the ruling party took and “correct the mistake” in the Senate, so that “relations can go back to their usual rhythm soon enough.”
However, Socialist Party leader Francois Hollande made it clear earlier that his party was in favor of the denial bill when it was around in 2006 and would still display the same attitude this time around.
Prior to the French vote, thousands of Turks gathered in downtown Paris to protest the French Parliament over the denial bill, a movement organized by hundreds of Turkish-French civil society organizations. Protestors interviewed by the Reuters news agency before the voting started told the agency that they regarded the vote as an attempt at censoring their freedom of expression, as they expressed their belief that such rhetoric emerged whenever elections were held in France.
Severed Heads from Armenian Genocide
In 2001, France recognized the so-called genocide, creating a crisis between Turkey and France, as French export levels dropped by 40 percent in the aftermath, as international media speculated that it was Ankara’s unofficial messages that discouraged Turkish companies from getting involved in business deals with their French counterparts. When a similar denial bill was brought to Parliament in 2006, Turkey froze military relations with the country and suspended over flight rights, but the 2006 bill was dropped earlier this year by the French Senate.
Child Victims of Genocide by Turkish Muslims
The disputed genocide of 1915 has been a matter of a fuming discussion between Turks and Armenians, as Armenians claim that Ottoman Turks carried out a systematic and mass murder of Armenians with the aim of eradicating them in the country. Turks say the Armenians were deported when they took up arms against the state at a time of chaos as the Ottoman Empire crumbled and modern day Turkey’s founders were fighting a political and armed war against foreign forces that tried to take over the country.
Turkey also recalled its ambassador in Paris as “the initial reaction” against French Parliament approval of the bill, a previously announced response to the possible approval of the bill.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
muslim-in-chief-again-breaks-campaign-promise-to-declare-the-armenian-genocide-a-genocide-by-turkey
joe-biden-tries-to-cover-up-obamas-refusal-to-acknowledge-armenian-genocide
turkish-american-muslims-celebrate-their-armenian-genocide
Muslim-in-Chief forces Army to bow down to Hamas-supporter CAIR’s demand that muslim women be allowed to wear headbags in JROTC
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: Military stories Leave a comment »
Oh, look! The Soldiers of Allah have a women’s division. What’s next, Army-issue burqas? Don’t ban the headbags, ban the bagheads.
DAILY CALLER (Terrorist financiers) from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has announced that the Department of Defense will now allow Muslim students participating in Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC) to wear Islamic headbags while in uniform.
The decision, announced Thursday, followed an October incident in which Muslim teen Demin Zawity quit JROTC when her commanding officer at a Brentwood, Tenn. high school would not allow her to wear her hijab in the homecoming parade.
CAIR later wrote to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta demanding “constitutionally-protected religious accommodations for the girl and for future Muslim JROTC participants.”
In a letter to the Muslim organization sent on Panetta’s behalf, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army Larry Stubblefield explained that based on the incident that led Zawity to quit JROTC, the Army will now be making more accommodations for religious headwear in the training program.
WHAT A NICE HIDING PLACE FOR A BOMB. LOOK EVERYBODY, THE NEW IMAGE OF THE US ARMY'S JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING PROGRAM
“Based on your concerns, the Army has reviewed its JROTC uniform policy and will develop appropriate procedures to provide Cadets the opportunity to request the wear of religious head dress, such as the turban and hijab (headbags),” Stubblefield wrote in the letter, made public by CAIR. “This change will allow Miss Zawity and other students the chance to fully participate in the JROTC program.”
Political commentator Jed Babbin, a former Deputy Undersecretary of Defense, noted that the point of a uniform is uniformity. “Look at the word: ‘uni’-’form’ — everybody wears the same thing,” Babbin told TheDC. “The military is by its own nature diverse and creates a culture in which everyone, regardless of their race or creed, is blended into one force for a common purpose. This [uniform exemption] divides it, balkanizes it on religious grounds… the point of JROTC is to get you ready for ROTC in college which is preparing you to go on active duty. So if you are going to allow it for ROTC? Why don’t you allow it on active duty?”
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
u-s-army-caves-to-cair-agrees-to-review-jrotc-ban-on-muslim-headbags
French judge jails Muslim man for punching a nurse who tried to remove his wife’s burqa during childbirth
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: IslamoMania 52 Comments »
A judge in Southern France jailed Nassim Mimoune, 24 for six months, telling him: “Your religious values are not superior to the laws of the republic.” Vive la France!
UK DAILY MAIL (H/R Lee S) Nassim Mimoune, 24, had already been expelled from the delivery room for branding the midwife a ‘rapist’ as she carried out an intimate examination of his wife.
Then through a window he spotted the nurse taking off his wife’s burqa as she prepared to give birth. He smashed open the locked door and hit the woman in the face, demanding she replace the full Islamic face veil.
As his wife delivered a baby boy, Mimoune was ejected from the building by security men from the hospital in Marseille and arrested for assault.
JERUSALEM: Think of them as a special canine Army unit sent in by God
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: Islam and the Jews 72 Comments »
Apparently angry that Muslims are occupying Jerusalem, the capital of the Jewish state, at least 150 wild dogs, many running in feral packs, have for months been roaming the streets of the Ras Hamis Arab neighborhood in Jerusalem.
INN (H/T Frederic F) Arabs in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Shuafat care complaining that they were experiencing a plague of wild dogs roaming the area. But Israeli dog catchers won’t help because they are afraid they’ll get attacked – not by the dogs by the Arabs.
A spokesperson for the municipality said that catching the dogs was complicated – because of the threat to the physical security of dog catchers who would normally be sent in to catch the animals.
The city has a full staff of dog catchers, but because of security concerns, a municipal spokesperson told reporters, they could only be sent in to do their jobs with an IDF or police crew to protect them, because of the strong likelihood that they will be pelted with stones or beaten with metal pipes – or worse – as has occurred on numerous occasions in the past.
As a result, residents of the neighborhood say they have taken to arming themselves with bricks and pipes to fight off the dog menace. The dogs, say the residents, are particularly vicious, and have chased and attacked many people, especially the elderly and children, who have a hard time outrunning them.
Attorney Nasrian Alian from the Israel Civil Rights Association said that the problem was present in all Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem. “In 2010 over 1,000 dogs were caught in Arab neighborhoods of Jerusalem. The city’s Veterinary Service does not provide sufficient services for the neighborhood and does not even operate in some of them – and they fail to do the job properly in areas where they do operate,” she told reporters.
In response, the municipality said that the IDF no longer permits municipal workers to enter some Arab neighborhoods without a security detail to protect them. Shuafat is one of those neighborhoods, the city said.
Attacks on Israeli workers in Jerusalem Arab neighborhoods are not uncommon, and numerous workers have been badly injured when Arabs converged on them as they tried to undertake maintenance work in Arab areas.
In 2008, for example, two city workers were attacked as they were driving on Salah A-Din Street, a main road in eastern Jerusalem, when they realized the road was blocked by flaming dumpsters. They were forced to stop, and their vehicle was then attacked by dozens of Arab men, who hurled rocks through the windows and hit the sides of the car with metal rods. The two managed to escape after driving onto the sidewalk. In another incident, a municipal sanitation worker lost an arm earlier this year when a bomb placed in a dumpster exploded.
SOME DOGS ARE TRAINED BY THE IDF TO ATTACK THE ENEMY
YOU’RE A GOOD JIHADI, CHARLIE BROWN
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: Laughing at Islam Leave a comment »And the anti-Islamization of America continues. Anyone see Charlie’s 72 red-haired virgins?
The LOWE’S commercial that was pulled off ‘All-American Muslim’
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: Islam in America Leave a comment »HARDLY. It’s a parody of a Lowe’s commercial which tries, but fails, to make people think Muslims are just like the rest of us. They are not. And neither are the people in the show, ‘All-American Muslim.’
Be sure not to miss the guy in the car who pulls a photo of his ‘wife’ out of his wallet.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS ABOUT LOWE’S AND ALL-AMERICAN MUSLIM:
jewophobia-hamas-front-group-cair-expands-its-anti-semitic-hate-crusade-against-jewish-owned-lowes
ask-lowes-not-to-capitulate-to-a-meeting-with-the-shakedown-artists-of-cair
like-rats-off-a-sinking-ship-advertisers-on-tlcs-all-american-muslim-are-fleeing
kayak-explains-its-decision-for-pulling-its-advertising-off-all-american-muslim
new-list-of-tlcs-all-american-muslim-sponsors-to-contact
thank-lowes-for-not-backing-down-from-their-decision-to-pull-ads-from-tlcs-all-american-muslim-show
lowes-another-advertiser-pulls-the-plug-on-all-american-muslim-2
tlcs-all-american-muslim-latest-sponsor-update
tlcs-all-american-muslim-series-sponsor-boycott-list
all-american-muslim-alert-jeff-gets-his-girl-back-now-he-needs-to-get-rid-of-the-bitch
‘JEWOPHOBIA?’ Hamas Front Group CAIR expands its anti-semitic hate crusade against Jewish-owned LOWE’S
Posted: December 22, 2011 Filed under: CAIR Nazis Leave a comment »
At least 87 advertisers have pulled their ads off ’All-American Muslim’ too, but CAIR isn’t going after them. We can only conclude that LOWE’S ‘Jewish’ ownership is the reason the Hamas terror funders from CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) continue their ‘Jewophobic’ hate campaign against LOWE’S.
Despite repeated calls for boycotts of LOWE’S for its decision to pull its advertising from the low-rated TLC show, ‘All-American Muslim,’ our sources at LOWE’S are reporting the chain of home improvement stores is having its best Christmas selling season ever.
According to FLORIDA FAMILY ASSOCIATION , EIGHTY SEVEN (87) companies that had advertised on All American Muslim at least one time before did NOT advertise again during the December 18th episodes of All-American Muslim. Florida Family Association will NO longer post the names of the companies that pull off the show because of intense scrutiny by opponents.
CAIR’S constant harassment of LOWE’S has included threats of more boycotts if the company refuses to meet with CAIR’s community organizers. So far, LOWE’S has ignored CAIR’s demands. The following is the latest email I received from CAIR on this issue:
Don’t Let Lowe’s Off the Hook for Appeasing Anti-Muslim Bigotry
Take a letter to your local Lowe’s store manager, post a photo online
(WASHINGTON, D.C., 12/21/2011) — The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) today urged all people of conscience to continue to hold Lowe’s corporate headquarters accountable for its decision to appease anti-Muslim bigotry by delivering a letter of protest to a store manager and posting a photo of that action online. Nearly 250,000 people have already expressed their disappointment in Lowe’s.
A sample letter to Lowe’s managers provided by CAIR states:
Dear Lowe’s Manager:
We are visiting your store today to express our deep disappointment in the decision by Lowe’s to pull its advertising from “All American Muslim.”
This decision plays directly into the hands of groups like the Florida Family Association (FFA), whose vision for America encompasses bigotry, intolerance, and division. Since FFA is essentially a one person organization, Lowe’s faced no real threat to its business interests had it opted to ignore the group.
In the wake of your decision to pull your advertising from “All American Muslim” the pure hatred expressed on your Facebook page by people who hate Muslims and foreigners was very clear. We are deeply concerned that leadership in your corporation felt that catering to such a crowd was in the best interest of the Lowe’s brand.
It is our sense that the apology Lowe’s issued in no way mitigated the action of pulling your advertising to appease bigotry.
Lowe’s senior executives should meet with community organizations to repair the damage done by this rash decision. Lowe’s should agree to undertake reasonable actions to show the broader American public that it’s business model includes no room for bigotry. Until that time, we have no interest in your products.
The home improvement chain recently pulled its advertising from TLC’s new reality series “All-American Muslim” because of an anti-Muslim campaign initiated by fringe right-wing groups like the Florida Family Association (FFA) and Internet hate sites such as “Bare Naked Islam” — which recently featured a number of threats of violence targeting U.S. and European mosques. The hate groups objected to the show’s non-stereotypical portrayals of American Muslims.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
like-rats-off-a-sinking-ship-advertisers-on-tlcs-all-american-muslim-are-fleeing
ask-lowes-not-to-capitulate-to-a-meeting-with-the-shakedown-artists-of-cair
kayak-explains-its-decision-for-pulling-its-advertising-off-all-american-muslim
new-list-of-tlcs-all-american-muslim-sponsors-to-contact
thank-lowes-for-not-backing-down-from-their-decision-to-pull-ads-from-tlcs-all-american-muslim-show
lowes-another-advertiser-pulls-the-plug-on-all-american-muslim-2
tlcs-all-american-muslim-latest-sponsor-update
tlcs-all-american-muslim-series-sponsor-boycott-list
all-american-muslim-alert-jeff-gets-his-girl-back-now-he-needs-to-get-rid-of-the-bitch
[UPDATED] Ron Paul storms off CNN set after being asked why he blamed Israel for the 1993 terror attack on the World Trade Center
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American Leave a comment »
Ron Paul was noticeably miffed at the CNN reporter’s questions about the uber-racist newsletter he published for many years that was endorsed by the American Nazi party. But he refused to even comment on his antisemitic and untrue statements about Israel, and abruptly left.
Live Leak Ron Paul has a long and disturbing history of racialism and anti-Semitism. During an appearance on Chris Matthews’ ‘Hardball’ TV program on MSNBC a few years ago, Paul defended earlier comments regarding the 1964 Civil Rights Act, saying he would have voted against the Act in Congress because it imposed on the personal rights of private business owners.
Paul had published a plethora of newsletters over his political career with names including Ron Paul’s Freedom Report, Ron Paul Political Report, The Ron Paul Survival Report, among many others. In 1991, a Paul-controlled newsletter praised ex-Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. “Duke lost the [Senate] election [in Louisiana], but he scared the blazes out of the Establishment,” it stated.
Paul also has expressed hostility toward the Jews. According to the Philadelphia Jewish Voice, Paul refused to return a campaign contribution in 2008 from white supremacist and notorious anti-Semite Don Black. Paul has reportedly called Israel “evil” and has alleged that the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, might have blown up the World Trade Center in 1993. In 1987, an edition of Paul’s Investment Letter described Israel as “an aggressive, national socialist (Nazi) state.”
MORE ABOUT RON PAUL’S RACIST, ANTI-SEMITIC, AND HOMOPHOBIC NEWSLETTERS, FRIENDS AND SUPPORTERS
ron-pauls-racism
selections-ron-pauls-newsletters
more-selections-ron-pauls-newsletters
And then there’s this: RON PAUL NEWSLETTERS and his Jeremiah Right Moment
RED STATE Ron Paul, ten years ago, took responsibility for the content, even admitted at one point that he had written some of them. Today, Ron Paul claims he knew nothing about them even though they generated around a million dollars in income for him.
The newsletters were the “Ron Paul” newsletters and each was written in the first person as if from Ron Paul, without an author’s byline, conveying that the views expressed were Ron Paul’s.
No one doubts that someone other than Ron Paul wrote them, but they were written as if they were from Paul and he profited handsomely and at one point took responsibility for writing some of them himself.
One of the newsletters claimed that gays were going to donate blood en masse in hopes of infecting the American blood supply with AIDS. Let’s presume Ron Paul did not write that.
But I know many Ron Paul supporters, including some in my church, who cast aspersions on Barack Obama for attending Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s church for 20 years. They don’t believe Barack Obama didn’t know Rev. Wright believed the CIA invented AIDS to kill black men. They will give Ron Paul a pass, but they will not give Barack Obama a pass.
Why? I fail to see how Ron Paul’s eponymous newsletter written in the first person as if from Ron Paul claiming gays intended to infect other Americans with AIDS through compromising our blood supply is any different from Reverend Wright claiming the CIA invented AIDS to kill black men.
If you know all these things about Ron Paul, and know he was perfectly fine with Neo-Nazis raising money for his campaign in 2008, and know he was perfectly fine going on Iranian national television to claim Israel keeps concentration camps wherein it routinely kills Palestinians, and you still intend to vote for him, I don’t really see that the Republican tent needs to be big enough to accommodate you.
Failed Palestinian female suicide bomber will try again and encourages women and children to kill Israelis by blowing themselves up
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: Islam and the Jews 17 Comments »This Baghead bitch was one of the 1,027 prisoners released in the swap for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit held by Hamas. And you wonder why Israel needs a security wall on the Gaza border?
FOX NEWS Reporter interviews 27 year old Wafa Samir Ibrahim al-Biss on location in Jerusalem. This is the first U.S. interview with a woman who was incarcerated after unsuccessfully attempting to kill Israelis with a bomb she had strapped to her body. As Vittert sees it, the report “shatters the illusion that those who are driven by hate can have their minds changed.” The report includes footage of the would-be suicide bomber at the very moment her detonator failed outside of a hospital, the SAME hospital where her life had been saved by Israeli doctors. After shedding her jacket, the woman can be seen crying and clutching at her neck and chest.
And this is how it all went down in 2005. She praises the Israeli doctors who treated her for 6 months. Her family even sent them a thank you note.
Never trust what any Muslim says to you, NEVER.
UK Court says, Muslim baby at risk of being 'honor' killed must be adopted
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: Religion of Hate 32 Comments »A baby at risk of becoming the victim of an ‘honor’ killing because she was born as the result of her unmarried Muslim mother’s secret affair must be adopted to keep her safe. Problem is, under Islam, legal adoption is forbidden for Muslims.
Qur’an 33.4 - “God did not make your adopted son as your own sons. To declare them so is your empty claim. God’s word is righteous and constitutes true guidance.”
TIMES Live (H/T Maria) Three senior judges rejected a bid by the one-year-old girl’s natural father to have her live with him and his wife. The child’s natural mother is in favour of adoption so that her own family will not find out about the birth.
The judges imposed unusually wide reporting restrictions banning the publication of all names and locations linked to the case because of the continuing dangers faced by mother and child.
The appeal court rejected an appeal by the father ‘F’ against a decision last July refusing him a residence order allowing the baby to live with him. The judge ordered that ‘baby Q’ should be adopted by a couple, also Muslim, from the same country as the mother, but from a different community. (Not possible, see video below)
BECAUSE ISLAM BANS ADOPTION, MUSLIM ORPHANAGES ARE OVERFLOWING
She found there would be “a very significant risk of two and two being put together” if the child went to the father because Q was quite obviously not the child of his wife, who had a child of her own.
If the child’s maternal grandfather found out about the affair “it would be a matter of intense almost unimaginable shame to him and his family”, said the judge. The appeal court said on Wednesday: “It 
was plainly the judge’s view that this might provoke a murder of the child and or mother to preserve the family’s honour.” The mother had consented to the adoption by the couple, who had been looking after her since December 2010.
The appeal judges said Q was conceived in a relationship “which was unacceptable to M’s traditional Muslim family and conducted in secrecy”. When M realised she might be pre
gnant she ran away from home. She was “terrified” over how her family would react. As soon as Q was born, she gave her daughter up for adoption because she “genuinely feared for Q’s safety should (her father) become aware of, or forced to acknowledge, her existence”.
Q’s grandmother had told the police that, if her husband found out about the child, “he would consider himself honour-bound to kill the child, the mother, the grandmother herself and the grandmother’s other children”.
Upholding Mrs Justice Parker’s decision to make an adoption order, the appeal judges said: “The mother’s evidence, supported as it was by her actions, and the evidence of [the father] and an experienced police officer, drove the judge to conclude that refusal of the order would carry with it a significant risk of physical harm.
Adoption of an orphan/helpless child was a very popular and moral practice amongst pre-Islamic Arabs. But the Prophet Muhammad forbade the Arab practice of adopting children as one’s own. Islam removes all the adopted son’s actual rights (his name, inheritance, property, right to be considered as a part of the family). One can care for an orphan in fostering capcity, but it is considered as an act of kindness and not real family and there can never be any legal relationship.
Some Islamic states have taken this narrowly, and are not even permitted to foster a child in the home. Other states, such as Egypt permit fostering in the home, but the parents are forced to evict the child at the first sign of puberty. So the 13 year old teens and tweens get put on the street or sent to an orphanage mill, or just plain kicked out and told to go away. Sick.
NORTH CAROLINA: 'Blondie Jihadi' brothers sentenced for role in homegrown terror plot
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American 26 Comments »
Two brothers from a family of converts to Islam have been sentenced to federal prison time for helping their father plan to carry out terrorist attacks against U.S. military and other targets.
Triad News14 (H/T TG) Earlier this year, both Dylan and Zakariya Boyd pleaded guilty to multiple charges related to a plot to attack the Marine Corps base in Quantico, Va. Each was facing the possibility of 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine but U.S. District Judge Louise Flanagan showed some leniency in the sentencing.
BOYD FAMILY: DAVID (father) DYLAN & ZAKARIA (Sons)
She acknowledged the powerful influence that Daniel Boyd exerted over his sons saying, “The depravity of your father is etched into the record.” Zak Boyd was sentenced first and given nine years in prison and a $3,000 fine. The U.S. government had asked for some leniency in his sentencing. ”But for his father’s ideology that was shoved down his throat, he would never be before this court,” Attorney John Bowler said.
BOYD BROTHERS' PARENTS
Dylan Boyd was sentenced next and given a prison term of eight years and a $1,000 fine. He was given a lesser punishment than his brother because, as the judge acknowledged, he had tried to stand up to his father and also because he has a young child to provide for. Both will receive credit for time served, which is more than two years, and both could be released early with good behavior.
Their father, Daniel Boyd, is accused of leading a group of eight men who were preparing Jihadist attacks against American military targets. He was originally set to be sentenced with his sons but a court decided to wait until the trial of another suspect, Anes Subasic.
In October, a jury found three more of the Muslim jihadists in this Triangle Terror group guilty of conspiring to aid terrorist activities overseas.
WRAL Mohammad Omar Aly Hassan, 23, Ziyad Yaghi, 22, and Hysen Sherifi, 26, were among seven area men arrested in July 2009 on charges that they raised money to buy assault weapons and conduct training exercises. They also were accused of arranging overseas travel and contacts to help others carry out violent acts on behalf of a radical jihadist political agenda.
Jurors deliberated for about 10 hours over two days before finding all three guilty of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists. Yaghi and Sherifi also were convicted of conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people, but the jury acquitted Hassan on that charge.
Sherifi also was found guilty of two weapons counts and a charge of conspiracy to kill federal employees for a plot to attack the Marine base in Quantico, Va.
Relatives of the three men wept and expressed disbelief as they left the federal courthouse in New Bern. ”The truth will come. It’s a long nightmare. It’s not over,” said Hassan’s father, Aly Hassan. “Omar is innocent, and with the appeal, I’m sure he’s going to come out.” Sherifi and Yaghi face up to life in prison when they are sentenced later, while Hassan faces up to 15 years in prison.
A seventh defendant, Anes Subasic, will have a separate trial after deciding to represent himself in court. Authorities believe another man charged in the case, Jude Kenan Mohammad, 22, is in Pakistan. A ninth member of the group, Bajram Asllani, 30, was arrested in Kosovo last year, but the U.S. doesn’t have an extradition treaty with that country.
BOSTON: MUSLIM TERRORIST found guilty on all terrorism charges
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American 24 Comments »
A federal jury in Boston found a Sudbury Muslim man guilty of conspiring to help al-Qaeda and plotting to kill U.S. soldiers in Iraq.
CBS (H/T RevereRidesAgain) Tarek Mehanna, 29, was found guilty on four terror-related charges and three charges of lying to authorities. He now faces life in prison. Sentencing is April 12.
Prosecutors allege Mehanna and two friends conspired to go to Yemen so they could receive training at a terrorist camp with the intention of going on to Iraq to fight against U.S. soldiers there. Prosecutors say when they couldn’t find a camp, Mehanna returned home and began translating and distributing publications over the Internet to promote violent jihad.
TERRORIST SUPPORTERS OR OCCUPY WALL STREETERS? HARD TO TELL.
He was arrested on October 21, 2009 in a case investigated by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force. Mehanna’s lawyers say he went to Yemen to look for religious schools, not to seek terrorist training, and his online activities were protected by the First Amendment. (Religious schools, Terror training schools, what’s the difference?)
Prosecutors focused on hundreds of online chats in which they said Mehanna and his friends talked about their desire to participate in jihad.
Mehanna’s lawyers told jurors that prosecutors were using scare tactics by portraying Mehanna as a would-be terrorist and were trying to punish him for his beliefs. (Indeed they were. Muslims believe in terrorism)
His mother cried, yelled, and stomped her feet outside the court room. Mehanna’s younger brother tried to console her. Mehanna’s attorney J.W. Carney, Jr. said they were “disappointed” with the verdict and they will appeal.
Barack Hussein Obama opens up the Southern border to even more Islamic terrorists
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American 40 Comments »
Starting in January, the Obama Regime will slash the force of 1,200 National Guard troops working along the Mexican border to fewer than 300.
Daily Caller The Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Defense confirmed during a Tuesday morning conference call with members of Congress that the administration will be reducing the National Guard troop presence on the border with Mexico by 75 percent, according to Texas Republican Rep. Ted Poe.
In the video below, Arizona Republican Senator Jon Kyl says that Obama told him, “I won’t secure the border unless and until it is combined with comprehensive immigration reform.”
Obama has made part of Arizona ‘OFF-LIMITS’ to Americans.
H/T Liz
The administration representatives revealed that the National Guard’s presence on the border will be reduced from 1,200 to 300 troops and their budget will decrease from $120 million to $60 million.
“It is a mistake,” Poe told TheDC. “Last week Jason Altmire, Democrat from Pennsylvania, and I sent a letter to the president asking him not to reduce the number of National Guard troops. I’ve always thought 1,200 wasn’t enough. In fact I introduced legislation to put 10,000 at the border.”
Poe pointed to statistics as the reason he opposes the planned reduction. “GAO, the General Accounting Office, says the border is only 44 percent secure,” said Poe. “Well, if we only control 44 percent, who controls the other 56 percent? It’s not Mexico, it’s not the United States, well who is it? It’s the drug cartels. So its an unwise decision.”
“The addition of aerial surveillance assets allows the National Guard to better support DHS by shifting surveillance from fixed sites to mobile ones that can quickly match the dynamic environment of the border — a significant enhancement in the ability to detect and deter illegal activity at the border — and provide greater support to the thousands of men and women involved in border security,” they explained in a Tuesday press release.
The administration pointed out that Border Patrol apprehensions, which they regard as a “key indicator of illegal immigration” decreased in the 2011 fiscal year to 340,252, down 53 percent since 2008 and one fifth of what they were at their peak in the 2000 fiscal year. (Say what? Apprehending fewer illegals means there are fewer illegals trying to cross or just fewer caught?)
There were inklings about the possibility of significant National Guard troop reductions last week. At that point Poe and Altmire spearheaded a letter — with several other members — to President Barack Obama urging him to keep the troop levels at 1,200.
“The physical presence of the National Guard has been successful at deterring illegal crossings and violence, and should be maintained until the U.S. Border Control can increased its numbers and regain operational control of the majority of the U.S.-Mexico border,” they wrote.
RELATED STORIES/VIDEOS:
663-muslims-with-ties-to-islamic-terrorist-countries-arrested-along-southwest-border-during-2010
the-mexican-drug-cartel-story-you-never-hear-about
White House stands by Joe Biden's statement that "the Taliban is not our enemy"
Posted: December 20, 2011 Filed under: Say WHAT? 40 Comments »
“Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That’s critical,” Biden said. “There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy, because it threatens U.S. interests. If, in fact, the Taliban is able to collapse the existing government, which is cooperating with us in keeping the bad guys from being able to do damage to us, then that becomes a problem for us.”
FOX NEWS The White House on Monday defended Vice President Joe Biden for saying that the Taliban isn’t an enemy of the United States despite the years spent fighting the militant Islamic group that gave a home to Al Qaeda and its leader Usama bin Laden while he plotted the Sept. 11 terror attacks.
“It’s only regrettable when taken out of context,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said of the vice president’s remarks.
During Biden’s interview with Newsweek last week, the vice president said it’s “good enough” for the U.S. if Afghanistan stops being a “haven for people who do damage and have as a target the United States of America” and its allies. He added that the U.S. is supportive of a reconciliation process between the Afghan government and the Taliban even if it’s questionable whether a reconciliation is possible.
Recent Comments