Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and even Bill O'Reilly are wrong about the 9/11 terrorists
Posted: October 26, 2010 Filed under: 9/11 Censored Leave a comment »The 9/11 terrorists weren’t “Muslim extremists” as the hags of The View called them. They weren’t just “Muslims,” either. Terry McDermott, a liberal newspaper reporter for the LA Times, says they were all “model Muslims,” actually “perfect soldiers” for Allah.
This will come as no surprise to regular BNI readers, but there are new readers here each day who need to understand this.
IBDMcDermott should know. After traveling to the hometowns of the Muslim hijackers and investigating their family backgrounds, McDermott discovered they were not heretics or even “extremists,” but in fact good, pious Muslims. And their families and communities encouraged them to join the never-ending Islamic holy war, or jihad, against us.
The lefties at NPR who fired analyst Juan Williams and the cackling hens on “The View” who walked out on his Fox colleague Bill O’Reilly would benefit enormously from reading his book, “Perfect Soldiers: The Hijackers: Who They Were, Why They Did It.” It would open their PC-encrusted eyes to a truth that is already self-evident to most Americans.
The detail-rich book reveals that the 19 hijackers did not “hijack Islam,” as conventional East Coast wisdom and Muslim apologists would have it. They weren’t career criminals using the religion as an excuse to wantonly murder people. Nor were they misled into martyrdom by Osama bin Laden or other Svengali personalities.
On the contrary, they were deeply religious Muslims following the tenets of their faith, McDermott found. Most of them were from well-off families.
“Several were described as among the best boys — bright, respectful — in their towns,” he reports in his book. “Many had gone to university,” he adds. “Three had studied Islamic law.” At least one, Ahmed al-Haznawi, had memorized the Quran, a sign of deep devotion much respected by Muslim elders. In fact, he earned the honorary religious title of “hafiz” at a young age.
McDermott describes how another hijacker, Wail al-Shehri left home to train for jihad in Afghanistan after a long period of recitation of Quranic verses. He had the approval of a local imam.
But he wasn’t the only one who knew what they were planning. “Two-thirds of them told their families they were leaving to join the jihad,” McDermott writes, adding that their families did not discourage them. “They went where they were called by their religion.”
That’s not the story we heard after 9/11. In media interviews, the parents of the hijackers expressed shock about the deeds of their sons. We must have the wrong men, they insisted. Their boys could never do such a thing. Jihad? What jihad?
Take Egyptian Mohamed el-Amir, father of 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta. Right after 9/11, he denied knowing anything about his son’s activities. Then in 2005, after the London bombings, he confided to a CNN producer in his apartment in the upper-class Cairo suburb of Giza that his son had done a good thing and that the London suicide bombers were following in his footsteps. He said all this was just the start of a 50-year religious war, and that there would be many more fighters like his son.
El-Amir, a “skilled lawyer” by McDermott’s account, declared that terror cells around the world were a “nuclear bomb that has now been activated and is ticking.” He passionately vowed that he would do anything within his power to encourage more attacks.
Instead of mouthing tolerant-sounding platitudes and misleading their audiences about the true nature of the threat we still face, Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar and NPR’s executives should educate themselves. H/T Roland G
NIMBY: More Anti-Mosque Activism
Posted: October 26, 2010 Filed under: Islam in America Leave a comment »Residents of Selden, NY have been swamped with fliers denouncing the expansion of the Islamic Association of Long Island.
NY POST The fliers list a litany of complaints, including calls to prayer being broadcast over loudspeakers and snarled traffic. The notes warn that the expansion of Long Island’s oldest Muslim house of worship will force residents to deal with “rude, aggressive people when you confront them to move their cars away from our driveways.”
Mosque members argue that the fliers are ill-informed attempts at fear-mongering and that the expansion is simply an effort to accommodate a burgeoning Muslim population in Suffolk County.
Supporters say one flyer attempts to whip up hysteria by pointing out a child abuse rap against a former Mosque employee.
Leaders want to expand the Selden facility from 5,600 sq. ft. to 8,000 sq. ft. Residents opposed to the mosque denied that they are anti-Muslim, just anti-traffic. “It really bugs me when they label you so quickly,” said one angry resident. “This is a quality-of-life issue. That’s it.” (Muslims ARE a threat to quality of life)
ST. LOUIS: Muslims in the hood
STL BEACON For four years, the St. Charles Muslim group has been trying to get land for a center, and that’s longer than 
it’s taken to build other centers. But in that time, they’ve come up against the same issues that some other centers have.
In St. Charles, Mir Asif says, the Muslim Community Center did find a piece of land last year, but according to him and reports from the St. Charles County Suburban Journals, county officials said the entrance wasn’t wide enough and a neighbor wouldn’t give up any land.
In 2007, St. Louis County’s County Council voted against allowing a community center that Imam Muhamed Hasic was trying to build in south county. The land was bought as residential and needed to be rezoned.
For Anjum Shariff, who’s lived in St. Louis most of his life, the challenges in the future are also community-wide, especially in dealing with some generally held perceptions and misconceptions about Muslims. Those ‘misperceptions’ include the ideas that when Muslims do bad things:
They’re doing so because their religion tells them to.
Qur’an:47:4 “So, when you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle, smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them. At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind them firmly, making them captives. Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam.”
Men dominate women in marriage.
Bukhari:V3B48N826 “The Prophet said, ‘Isn’t the witness of a woman equal to half of that of a man?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is because of the deficiency of a woman’s mind.’”
The culture in Muslim countries is created entirely around Islam.
Qur’an 8:59 “The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.”
Muslims are openly or secretly anti-Western.
Qur’an 3:56 “As for those disbelieving infidels, I will punish them with a terrible agony in this world and the next. They have no one to help or save them.”
Women have limited rights.
Tabari IX:113 “Allah permits you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain, they have the right to food and clothing. Treat women well for they are like domestic animals and they possess nothing themselves.
Muslims as a group are monolithic, with no ideological, philosophical or political differences.
Qur’an 8:12 “Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.”
The Far Left 'Center for American Progress' wants to poison your mind with lies about Islam
Posted: October 26, 2010 Filed under: Islam in America Leave a comment »The Center’s article on ‘Why Religious Education Matters’ recommends teaching Americans and American schoolchildren that Islam is very compatible with Western Democracies.
I’ll skip over all the leftie condescending propaganda about how ignorant most American are about religions other than their own and get right to the point: ISLAM.
{—-}
American ProgressIt is important for Americans to have a basic understanding of religions and cultures of nations around the world. We live in a globalized community where borders are increasingly nonexistent and religion is often a powerful force for either violence and division or for social cohesion and good.
A lack of religious education can have serious consequences. This country has recently seen a dangerous surge in Islamophobia—much of it stoked by a well-orchestrated campaign of right-wing groups and leaders. But anti-Muslim hate speech has unfortunately gained traction partly because the public knows so little about Islam.
A Pew poll released in August shows that 55 percent of Americans “do not know very much”about Islam while 25 percent “know nothing at all.” Despite this lack of knowledge 38 percent of Americans have an “unfavorable” view of Islam and 35 percent believe that Islam “is more likely to encourage violence than other [religions].”
Americans might have less negative views if they knew, for example, that Islam is compatible with Western values and democracy, that it teaches peace, and that Muslim Americans have been part of this country since before we were a nation. (In other words, America really IS an Islamic nation)
September’s Pew poll shows that less than a third (23 percent) of respondents know that the Bible can be taught in public school classrooms as a form of literature. The sacred texts of other faiths can be taught as well, providing children with a broader understanding of both Christianity and other world religions.
It’s unfortunate, then, that the Texas State Board of Education recently squandered a valuable opportunity to educate the children of Texas about world religions and their history. According to NYDailyNews, school board member Randy Rives called for a resolution to reject social studies textbooks that “offend Texas law with respect to treatment of the world’s major religious groups by significant inequalities of coverage space-wise and/or by demonizing or lionizing one or more of them over others.”
The resolution stems from a claim that more sentences in social studies textbooks were pro-Islam or anti-Christian than pro-Christian or anti-Islam. The Texas school board approved the resolution by a 7-5 vote, urging textbook publishers to l
imit what they print about Islam in world history books. texas-to-vote-on-scrubbing-the-pro-islam-lies-and-propaganda-from-history-textbooks
This decision could have major repercussions. Since Texas is one of the largest clients of textbook publishers, content adopted in Texas schools often leads to the adoption of similar content across the country. This is likely to have national consequences. John L. Esposito, founding director for the Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University writes: 
“Islam is not the enemy. Ignorance is. And educators—in Texas or any place else—should never endorse it.”
Some groups are concerned about Islamophobia’s rise in the United States, and they‘re pushing back against intolerance. For instance, White Cloud Press, based in Ashland, Oregon, is offering a half-price sale on books it publishes about Islam.
According to the publisher’s website, the promotion aims to “to help Americans better understand Islam and the Qur’an.” The company hopes to spread rather than suffocate religious understanding: “Rather than burning a Qur’an we hope Americans will be learning about the Qur’an.”
I agree with that last sentence and suggest you begin to learn about the Quran here: a-1400-year-old-book-that-dictates-muslim-behavior-today
Even an elephant seal is better than a Muslim man
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: Islam NOT Leave a comment »H/T Susan K
[UPDATED) "They were in shock at the President's behavior"
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: EnemyWithin-American Leave a comment »White House Insider dishes the dirt on the manic Muslim-in-Chief.
(Now See Part II at the end)
NewsFlavor Our latest interview with the White House Insider reveals a Democratic Party civil war, with growing opposition to the Obama White House.
Author’s Note: This interview took place for nearly two hours over the weekend at the office of the White House Insider. We wish to extend our gratitude for their making time to meet with us despite an extremely demanding schedule. The information contained in this interview is among the most in depth and fascinating to date, and due to the extent of information, will come in two installments. Here is installment one:
Care to let us know what campaign you are working for? Sorry, I don’t wish to reveal that. I’ll just say it’s a campaign that has already received significant national attention, and the working time frame to prepare for Election Day is very short. We are in scramble mode, but things appear to be going well, all things considered.
Ok then, can I ask you your predictions for the November election, now that we are just days away? How bad do you think it’s going to be for the Democrats? I have been given access to a significant amount of internals all across the country. Senate, House, and governor races, and…well, it is going to be a very tough night for the Democratic Party. It is as bad as I and some others feared it would be for us a couple months ago. Nothing has improved - maybe a few races here and there have tightened, but overall, it’s looking very bad for us. Actually worse than the national polling data currently suggests even.
So how many seats do you see Democrats losing in the House? At least 50 – possibly a bit more. It will be worse than what we saw in 1994, and I was around for that ass-kicking.
How about the Senate? That one is just a bit tougher to call. I think the Republicans right now have a 50/50 chance of taking a very slim majority. But at the very least, they are going to gain seven seats, which will basically shut down any sure-thing Democratic Party agenda in the Senate. We don’t fear that as much as what is going on with the House. It is going to be very difficult working with the House – the Republicans are taking on an increasingly aggressive tone heading into the election, and I think in 2011, they are going to putting on an all out offensive against the Obama agenda.
As a Democrat, do you see that as a bad thing? Not necessarily, but at the same time, I don’t wish to see the political extremes swing back the other way. (Smiles) Then again, maybe I do, because if that happens, the Republicans could be right back on their ass in 2012 – IF the Democrats can get their -expletive- together, which at this point, I am not too hopeful of.
So who do you place the most blame for the Democratic Party’s troubles today? President Obama and his administration -without a doubt. The Obama White House has been a political train wreck from day one, and it isn’t getting any better at the moment. You already know my feelings on that.
Previously you stated that Obama could be re-elected in 2012, and that if he improved himself on the job – that if he took a more active and responsible role as President, that you would support him. Do you still feel that way? Is that what I said? (shakes head) Well…(pauses) Ok, I’ll just come out and say what is already underway, and to hell with the possible consequences to me. I will not support Barack Obama in 2012. That possibility has left the table for me. Based on what I know, what I have been told, what I have seen in recent weeks…no, I cannot support the President for a second term. My concern for the party, for the country…my conscience does not allow me that option any longer. Obama is not fit to be president. He simply does not possess the inclinations necessary to lead the country. And I don’t like saying that. I helped the man get elected. I was in the trenches day after day from city to city helping things get done in 2008…I take no pleasure in saying I was a part of that. And I take no pleasure in saying Obama should not be re-elected in 2012.
That is a very strong statement – anything recent that causes you to now say you will not support Obama in 2012? (Long pause – question is repeated) There is much I have been told, some I know, some more that will probably develop in the coming weeks and months. But you want specifics, right? I understand that…I’ll give you an example of why President Obama is not right for America. He sure as hell has not been right for the party. Not long ago, the president took a meeting. He’s late, which apparently is becoming more and more common with him. The meeting was almost cancelled. In strolls the president, joking with an aide. He plops down on a sofa, leans over and claps another guy on the back asking how he’s been. Apologizes for being late, says he was “held up”. He laughs some more. The meeting begins. After just ten minutes, during which time the president appears to almost totally withdraw into himself, an aide walks in and whispers something to the president, who then nods and quickly stands up, shakes a few hands and tells another aide to update him later on the rest of the meeting. As the president is walking out he is laughing at something yet again. He asked no questions of those at the meeting – not one. He left after just ten minutes, coming in laughing and leaving laughing. His behavior during that brief time he was there was described as “borderline manic”.
Ok, you have already stated previously that the president doesn’t show much interest in the day to day business of being president – why is this example so bad, or different? Care to know what that particular meeting was about on that day?
Certainly. Afghanistan. That meeting was an update on Afghanistan, and the President of the United States, the Commander in Chief, could give a -expletive-.
Were you actually there to witness this? No, I was long gone from the White House by then. It was told to me though by someone who was. They were there. First hand. They were also left to apologize to the ones left in the room after the president left. Some of these were military. They were not happy. No…that is not accurate. They were pissed. They didn’t say much at the time, but word got back. They were in shock at the president’s behavior. The country had just lost a number of soldiers the week prior, the public opinion on the war was falling…and the president didn’t seem to care. He arrives late, leaves early, appears to emotionally shut down during the actual discussion, and to then start laughing once again as he is leaving…how does someone reconcile with that kind of behavior? I can’t. It turns my stomach. I didn’t want to believe what I was being told, but I had seen similar kinds of behavior from the president myself, and I can’t dispute the credibility of the source. They have no reason to lie.
So is that one example the real tipping point for you in no longer being willing to support Obama in 2012? Or do you have any others you wish to share? Oh, I have others, though I cannot share all of them at this point because they involve some still in range of potential White House retribution. Then again, I suppose I am still in range of such retribution myself.
What do you mean by retribution? Punishment. Political punishment, and even personal punishment. The powers of a president extend far beyond the Oval Office – you know that. I make my living, and it has been a very good living, working within the system of politics. A president can create considerable…pressure if you will, to limit or even destroy my place in that system. Working with a president is an extraordinary and terrifying thing. In regards to my experience with Obama, it became far less extraordinary and far more terrifying. And it’s getting worse.
Terrifying? Yes, terrifying. To see one’s expectations so disappointed. To see a figure who wields such great power and influence fall so short of the responsibilities of that power and influence…that is terrifying to witness. Initially I developed great fear for my party – for the Democrats whose political careers were being destroyed by this administration and party leadership. Now I sincerely fear for my country.
So at this point you really don’t believe that President Obama can grow into a more effective leader? No.
But he could still be re-elected in 2012, right? Absolutely. He remains an effective campaigner – the best in politics, and these days, that can be enough to get elected. You don’t actually have to know what you are doing – you just have to look and sound like you know what you are doing.
But you don’t want to see Obama re-elected? I apologize if I’m repeating myself here, but I just want to clarify because in the past you still seemed hopeful that Obama could evolve and become a stronger leader, but that hope seems to have left you. If Barack Obama is the Democratic Party nominee, I will not participate in any way in his election. It will be the first time in some 20 years that I will have removed myself totally from the process of helping elect the Democratic Party candidate for President. (Leans toward me) I do not know if the country can survive another four years of Barack Obama, and frankly, I want nothing to do with helping us find out. The man is an incompetent. The man is a tool of the extreme far left that has utterly corrupted the Democratic Party. The man and those now closest to him in the administration appear to abhor America’s history. They detest anyone who does not fully subscribe to their positions. They are corrupt, they are increasingly paranoid, and they are taking this country down a path by which we may never recover.
You sound like Rush Limbaugh. -Expletive- you…(pause) I apologize for that, but no, I am not some right winger. You know that. I have spent decades helping to build the Democratic Party up. I have worked alongside some wonderful, sincere, intelligent people during that time. Some of those people have now seen their careers tarnished, or ended entirely due to this administration. Others are fighting for survival, but continue to face attack from this administration. Enough is enough. I will not defend, I will not support, I will not play a part in such blatant misuse of power and authority that continues to be the practice of this administration. No more. My primary goal now is to help as many good Democrats survive the disaster that will be the Novemberelections, and from there, provide a far more capable and competent candidate to be the Democratic Party nominee for 2012.
It sounds like you’re preparing for political war with this White House. Yes, I suppose that is a fair description of what is happening. I’m not alone. There are more and more of us within the Democratic Party who are ready to challenge this president.
Even if it tears the Democratic Party apart in the process? It won’t. It will get messy, it already is - but the party is stronger than the president…particularly this president. Remove the media protection, remove the support and protection of a Congressional leadership that has been carrying the water for the White House for the last two years, and you will see a White House greatly reduced. But the party will survive – and be made stronger for it. The American people need to know that the Obama administration does not represent the Democratic Party – and it is the Democratic Party that remains the party of the people. The Obama administration only represents themselves at the expense of all others. That fact needs to be made more known and that is what I intend to see get done after November.
That seems a very dangerous thing to do career-wise – take on the White House so directly. Absolutely. You got that right, but I have help in high places you know – I’m not so stupid as to do this alone.
High places? There still remain some in the Obama administration who are not fully supportive of the president…who are weighing certain options. I am confident there will be a significant challenge to the president from within the Democratic Party in 2012.
Hillary Clinton? (Winks) That would be great wouldn’t it?
So you support Hillary Clinton running against Obama in 2012? Absolutely – at this point, absolutely. And she could win you know. If things don’t improve dramatically in the country by then, she could win. Here’s your headline for today – there is a movement within the Democratic Party to make Hillary the nominee in 2012 – not Obama. I’m not talking a small group of “what ifs” here, I’m talking about significant members of the party, significant financial backers…a legitimate and serious move to make Hillary Clinton our nominee. It is not quite fully initiated yet, but it’s getting there. And I don’t mind saying so publicly now – Mr. President, you are failing this country, you are failing the Democratic Party, and we will not support your further interest in doing so for another four years.
In your email to me last week, you indicated a scandal was coming to the White House. Could you elaborate a bit more on that now?
PART TWO COMING SOON HERE: PART 2
H/T Paulo
The only good Muslim is an ex-Muslim
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: Religion of Hate Leave a comment »Ex-Muslim Nonie Darwish responds to the proponents of Shari’a (Islamic) Law by comparing it to Christianity.
Remember, Imam Feisal Rauf of the Ground Zero Victory Mosque, believes that Shari’a Law is compatible with American Law and he is endeavoring to bring Shari’a here.
PBS sent Senior Editor to speak at Terrorist Front Group CAIR's conference on "Defaming Islam"
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: CAIR Nazis Leave a comment »
On October 9, 2010 – less than two weeks before NPR fired Williams on October 21 – the federally-funded sister agency Public Broadcasting System (PBS) sent Joel Schwartzberg, Senior Editor of PBS Interactive to be a presenter at the CAIR Leadership Conference.
BIG JOURNALISM The news about NPR firing Juan Williams is opening the eyes of many in the media and public to the extraordinary rules of censorship that CAIR, other Muslim Brotherhood groups, and the “Establishment Left” impose to restrict free speech. But it’s not just NPR that responds to CAIR’s political pressure which may in itself be a violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
PBS apparently sent Schwartzberg to train “CAIR Leadership” knowing that CAIR had advertised the conference for several weeks listing the #1 reason to attend as, “You’re tired of seeing Islam defamed and want to do something about it.
To make this clear: PBS apparently sent Schwartzberg to train “CAIR leadership” at a conference held specifically to “do something about” the alleged problem of “Islam defamed.” The use of the concept of “defamation” of Islam should be a red flag alert to Congressional funders of PBS: CAIR’s conference publicity followed the instructions of the Organization of the Islamic Conference to enforce Shariah blasphemy and defamation laws in the U.S. – in this case, with the support of publicly funded PBS staff.
For years, the OIC has been trying to pass a law through the U.N. that would criminalize any “defamation” of Islam, defined as blasphemy within Shariah law itself. In the 2008 Organization of Islamic Conference “Ten Year Plan,” the OIC’s 56 Islamic state members resolved to, “Emphasize the responsibility of the international community, including all governments, to ensure respect for all religions and combat their defamation…endeavor to have the United Nations adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia, and call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments.” For Juan Williams, those “deterrent punishments” became what CAIR had demanded of NPR in 
the CAIR press release – “professional consequences” – when NPR fired Williams.
One more item: At that same October 9 CAIR meeting where PBS’ Schwartzberg presented, CAIR announced a new department devoted to opposing “Islamophobia.” They had previously received $325,000 from the Organization of Islamic Conference to oppose “Islamophobia” in America – presumably with those “Ten Year Plan” deterrent punishments. Their attack against Williams was presumably one of the first influence operations of that new “Islamophobia” department.
Your tax dollars partly fund the big-budget PBS, that sent Schwartzberg to train “CAIR Leadership” at a conference that had a primary goal of imposing shariah blasphemy (defamation) laws in America. PBS has a background of proselytizing for Islam with their “documentary” Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet” and of course, for blocking distribution of Frank Gaffney’s 2006 documentary about the Muslim establishment’s opposition to Muslim reformers, Islam versus Islamists.
Your tax dollars also fund the Department of Justice, where prosecutors named CAIR as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism finance trial in history, and where another team of prosecutors apparently are conducting a Grand Jury investigation of CAIR. Your tax dollars also pay for the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, where the judge just gave the greenlight to a fraud case brought against CAIR by African-American and Pakistani-American families, in spite of CAIR’s losing efforts to get it dismissed. READ MORE
H/T herr Oyal
CBS News backs up PBS’ pro-IslamoFascist positions
FRANCE: Muslims step up religious demands on public schools
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: Islamization of the West Leave a comment »
The High Council for Integration (HCI) reported growing problems with pupils of MUSLIM immigrant backgrounds who object to courses about the Holocaust, the Crusades or evolution, demand halal meals and “reject French culture and its values.”
REUTERS“It is becoming difficult for teachers to resist religious
pressures,” said the report, published in draft form by the newspaper Journal du Dimanche over the weekend. The final report will be presented to the 
government next month.
“We should now reaffirm secularism and train teachers how to deal with specific problems linked to the respect for this principle,” it said.
France’s strict separation of church and state relegates religion to the private sphere, an approach challenged by a growing Islamic identity among some of the five million Muslims in the country’s 65 million population.
REFUSING CLASSES, DEMANDING HALAL
Teachers often faced objections when they taught courses about world religions, the Holocaust or France’s war in Algeria, or discussed events related to Israel and the Palestinians or American military actions in Muslim countries, the study said.
“Teachers regularly find that Muslim parents refuse to have their children learn about Christianity,” it said. “Some think it amounts to evangelisation.” ”Anti-Semitism … surfaces during courses about the Holocaust, such as inappropriate jokes and refusals to watch films” about 
Nazi concentration camps, it said. “Tensions often come from pupils who identify themselves as Muslims.”
Teachers found they could discuss the trans-atlantic slave trade but met criticism from pupils when they brought up the history of slavery within Africa or in the Middle East.
Reflecting the promotion of anti-Darwinist thinking in Muslim countries, “evolution is challenged by pupils who posit divine or creationist action without any argument for it.”
In some areas with large immigrant populations, many pupils shun school cafeterias for religious reasons, even though most offer alternative dishes when pork is on the menu. ”Demand for halal menus is strong, even for the very young in public crèches,” it said. “In some cities, there are petitions for halal meals.”
The report stressed the state could allow alternatives to pork but could not allow halal meals because the price for ritually slaughtered meat included a tax paid to religious organisations that certify the food was properly prepared.
“The school cannot, in this sense, participate in the religious education of its pupils or conform to principles that it does not recognise,” the report said.
PHILOSOPHICAL UPHEAVAL
During Ramadan, some Muslim pupils harass others who don’t observe the annual daytime fast, it said. Boys who identify themselves as Muslims and reject French values harass girls who do well in class as “collaborators” with the “dirty French.”
Some girls ask to be excused from gymnasium or pool sessions because they are not supposed to mix with boys, it added.
The report said French schools must insist on co-education, equal rights and mutual respect. “Being a French citizen means accepting challenges to one’s opinions … this is the price to pay for the freedom of opinion and expression.
“Must we recall that the crime of blasphemy has not existed in France since the French Revolution?” it asked. ”The principle of secularism leads to a profound relativisation of religion. This is a philosophical upheaval that religions only consent to with difficulty,” it said.
PAKISTAN: $$Billions of your tax dollars are paying for this
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: EnemyWithin-foreign Leave a comment »Hillary Clinton just pledged another $2 billion to Pakistan in addition to the $7.5 billion she gave them last year to help the Pakistani Army fight terrorism. These videos are of the Pakistani Army & police.
hillary-clinton-pledges-2-billion-more-to-pahkeestan
PAKISTANI SOLDIERS BEATING SUSPECTS
PAKISTANI ARMY TORTURING MEN IN SWAT
WOMAN ABUSED AND RAPED MULTIPLE TIMES BY PAKISTANI ARMY
BRUTAL EXECUTION OF 6 YOUNG MEN BY PAKISTANI ARMY
Fast Forward to 2:30
PAKISTANI POLICE BRUTALITY
PAKISTAN EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS BY ARMY CONFIRMED
Albany man beaten by a Muslim in homophobic attack
Posted: October 25, 2010 Filed under: Religion of Hate Leave a comment »23-year old man suffered a black eye, six stitches, and possible blindness from a beating at a pizza shop by a Muslim employee who allegedly yelled homophobic slurs during the assault.
See video here: FOX NEWS
Vincent Webster and his best friend, who prefers to remain nameless, stopped by Yankee’s Pizza on Central Ave. Vincent said he spilled some parmesan cheese and that is when a confrontation ensued.3-muslims-shoot-bb-gun-into-the-face-of-a-homosexual
why-dont-homosexualsliberals-in-america-have-a-problem-with-islam
european-muslims-debate-should-gays-be-executed
nyc-muslim-cabbie-kicks-gay-couple-out-of-his-taxi
Tony Blair's sister-in-law has lost her mind
Posted: October 24, 2010 Filed under: Islamic Britain Leave a comment »She just converted to Islam because of a holy experience she had in Iran. I wonder if they genitally mutilated her?
UK Guardian Journalist and broadcaster Lauren Booth, 43 – Cherie Blair’s sister – now wears a hijab whenever she leaves her home, prays five times a day and visits her local mosque whenever she can.
She decided to become a Muslim six weeks ago after visiting the shrine of Fatima al-Masumeh in the city of Qom.
“It was a Tuesday evening and I sat down and felt this shot of spiritual morphine, just absolute bliss and joy,” she said in an interview today. When she returned to Britain, she decided to convert immediately.
Booth – who works for Press TV, the English-language Iranian news channel – has stopped eating pork and reads the Qur’an every day. She is currently on page 60. Booth has stopped drinking alcohol and says she has not wanted to drink since converting.
Before her spiritual awakening in Iran, she had been “sympathetic” to Islam and has spent considerable time working in Palestine, she said, adding that she hoped her conversion would help Blair change his presumptions about Islam. H/T Tamarah
MORE INSANITY FROM BOOTH: Why I became a baghead
"Drive out the Christians." It really is Britain's Islamic Republic right now.
Posted: October 24, 2010 Filed under: Islamic Britain Leave a comment »
A Labour minister says his party has been infiltrated by a radical, fundamentalist Muslim group that wants to create an “Islamic social and political order” in Britain.
KitmanTV Muslims have infiltrated a labour party, already heavily infiltrated by revolutionary socialists andKGB-sympathising traitors. In short – the unholy alliance is successfully running things in Great Britain. Comparing the legislation in islamic republics, former socialist countries and the official Labour Party Program you have to arrive at one of two simple conclusions: Either there simply is no limit to the stupidity of the Labour Party; or they are themselves involved in a most evil scheme of deception and betrayal of their own electorate, the very people who will be first to face the consequences.
The Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE) — which believes in jihad and sharia law, and wants to turn Britain and Europe into an Islamic state — has placed sympathisers in elected office and claims, correctly, to be able to achieve “mass mobilisation” of voters.
“They are acting almost as an entryist organisation, placing people within the political parties, recruiting members to those political parties, trying to get individuals selected and elected so they can exercise political influence and power, whether it’s at local government level or national level,” he said.
“They are completely at odds with Labour’s programme, with our support for secularism.”
Read the whole story: UK TELEGRAPH
SCOTLAND: Why a 'HALAL HAIR SALON' when they wear bags on their heads anyway?
Posted: October 24, 2010 Filed under: Women Leave a comment »“Our salon is completely discreet, completely hidden from the public, from men, whereas the salons here, men still walk past and they can still see in or come in.”
Herald Scotland With its frosted windows, CCTV cameras, and tightly monitored security entrance, it is going to be one of Aberdeen’s most secretive business enterprises. So, you could be forgiven for wondering if the shop has something to hide.
Well, it does – its customers. Or rather it is the customers who want to remain hidden. For this is Scotland’s first ‘halal hairdressers’ – a beauty salon which conforms to the strict rules of Islam; a place were Muslim women who wear the veil or headscarf can be seen uncovered without the risk of the gaze of men.
Discreet Creative Hairdressing, scheduled to open in three weeks, is the brainchild of 21-year-old Mahida Iqbal and her husband of nine months, Fueb Mieh.
The salon will be a ‘man-free zone’. The frosted windows will stop any inquisitive men passing by from gawping at the clients. No-one can get in without passing through a secure buzzer entry system with CCTV. All this means that the Muslim ladies who have come for a new hair-do can remove their headscarves safe in the knowledge that only other women can see them.
Iqbal hit on the idea when she began wearing the headscarf for the first time last year, although she credits her husband – a fellow entrepreneur who runs Indian takeaways – for coming up with the proposal.
“At first I was just going to open up a hair salon that was going to be ladies-only,” said Iqbal. “But then my husband suggested I should target the Muslim community because there isn’t a salon yet in Aberdeen that provides these services.” She spoke to Muslim women who wanted a ‘halal’ service, but had nowhere to go. “So I used to go and do homers for the ladies, or they would come to my house.”
While there are other salons in Scotland which offer a ladies-only 
service, Iqbal wants to offer something geared to the needs of the Muslim community.
She said: “There are hair salons in Glasgow that are ladies-only, but not like our salon. Our salon is completely discreet, completely hidden from the public, from men, whereas the salons here, men still walk past and they can still see in or come in. Ours has a buzzer entry system, and we’ve got CCTV so that we can see who’s actually approaching the door.
“We can allow people in and if there is a man there then we won’t let him in. And there’s the window frosting as well. There’s a big population in Aberdeen that are Muslim. There’s Pakistani, Bengali, African, black American, Arabic – there’s a very large Muslim community. And me myself, attending mosque and attending Muslim events, I’ve got to know a lot of the Muslim ladies, so I’m hoping to generate a lot of business by word of mouth.”
However, Iqbal is not content to stop at hair-styling alone. Her salon will be a haven to a whole range of the pampering needs for Muslim women, with a variety of specialist beauty techniques such as henna tattooing and facial threading – an ancient hair-removal technique – also on offer.
“We’ve got an African hair stylist because afro hair is different from European hair, so she’s going to be doing braiding and taking care of African clients. We’re going to have a make-up artist, a beautician, a nail technician, a henna artist, a threading specialist, and teeth whitening as well.”
“It is somewhere where customers can feel comfortable, feel pampered and relaxed, knowing that no-one is going to come in and disturb them,” Iqbal added. “Muslim husbands can feel relaxed knowing that their wife is safe, where no man is going to be able to see them, and then they can come home and show their beauty. Muslim clients have never experienced this ever. It’s a great feeling.”
RELATED STORIES:
you-can-put-lipstick-on-a-pig-2
the-first-halal-muslim-online-sex-shop-opens
muslim-hairdresser’s-‘hurt-feelings’-leads-to-a-4000-payout
NON-ISLAM VIDEO OF THE WEEK
Posted: October 24, 2010 Filed under: Islam NOT Leave a comment »Enjoy!
BAN KI MOON warns Europe against "dangerous trend of intolerance toward Muslim immigrants"
Posted: October 24, 2010 Filed under: EnemyWithin-foreign Leave a comment »
What I want to know is how much money is Ban Ki Moon getting from the OIC Organization of Islamic Conference?
subvert these values and thus the very idea of what it means to be a citizen of the European Union,” he continued.
“Europe’s darkest chapters have been written in language such as this. Today the primary targets are immigrants of the Muslim faith,” he said. “Europe cannot afford stereotyping that closes minds and breeds hatred, and the world cannot afford a Europe that does this.” (Europe sees the Muslims and remembers the Nazis, you idiot)
Horst Seehofer, a senior conservative member of Angela Merkel’s government, said Germany should not accept more migrants from “alien cultures,” such as Turks and Arabs.
Germany’s populist concerns over perceived Muslim integration problems, follow similar debates in countries including the Netherlands, France and Switzerland.
Listen to Moonbeam berating Europe and the liberals and Muslims in the audience applauding him.
Recent Comments