Saudi cleric explains, “When Islamic law calls for the chopping off of a hand, it does so because the hand is the criminal, a ‘treacherous’ hand that took someone else’s property. Hence, Saudi Arabia has the world’s lowest crime rate.”
Just being accused of adultery, even with no evidence or witnesses, can get an Islamic woman a sentence of DEATH BY STONING.
A friend of mine witnessed such an execution by Hamas in what was occupied Gaza back in the ’90′s. In his own words….
“I was in Israel for a little more than a year. This was back in the late 90′s. I saw the ‘Pallywood ambulance’ scheme first hand and how most of the fighting is on a particular corner in Gaza. I realized that there was a lot of stage direction going on. But there was nothing staged about the stonings, beheadings, limbs chopped off for the minor “crime” of being hungry and taking a pita bread from a street vendor without paying.
I saw Gaza stonings, Iranian-style. There were two teenagers. My translator said that they had been seen talking with a Coptic priest and going out without a male. Two holes had been dug for them. I was as part of the crowd and at the time I had a beard and didn’t stand out at all. The crowd was chanting ‘Allah Akbar’ and some guy with a megaphone was apparently reading out the accusations and Shari’a sentence of these poor kids basically, 16 and 18, their lives had hardly began.
So they take the two girls and bind them. They’re put into the holes which leaves basically their head and shoulders exposed. Some more bullhorn Allah Akbars, and crowd responding. Kids (mom nursing kids!!) wearing these green headbands and dressed like little sultans, women, and lots of screaming men. So people pick out a stone – my translator said that it has to be the right size, and ideally weighs 10-15 lbs.
The crowd begins throwing stones at the two young girls who are FACING THEM from inside the holes, unable to move and bound up. Rocks hit their heads, gashing the head of the younger girl who begins gushing blood from her mouth and nose. Another barrage of stones and her head is split wide open, the white robe she’s in is now blood-red. The other girl is seeing this and screaming her head off, begging Allah to make her death quick. She yells something at the crowd and is rewarded with a rock that literally cracks her head open and causes massive bleeding. She had foam coming from her mouth, her skull appeared to be fractured.
The first girl is completely freaking out as she is bleeding to death. A few more rocks well aimed and the two girls are twitching in the throes of death The whole gruesome affair TOOK A GOOD HOUR from when they started putting the girls into the holes until they were dying.
What really blew my mind was a gang of youths, with faces covered, wearing green Hamas headbands, who went up to each of the girls and put bullets into them just to be sure they were dead. When one was shot she was still alive and was twitching, apparently having a seizure.
There were several old bearded Imams who passed the fatwa against the two girls.
As I said, I’ve seen some REALLY inhumane acts commited in the name of Islam and Mo’ (Mohammed), (PBUH) may he burn in Hell for an eternity.”
Teenaged girl stoned to death in Iraq for falling in love with the wrong boy.
Sisters Zohreh and Azar Kabiri, from the town of Shahriar in Tehran Province, were charged with adultery and sentenced to death by stoning. The verdict comes six months after each sister had already carried out a sentence of 99 lashes for the same crime.
Eleven people in Iran, currently on adultery charges, await their death sentence by stoning…nine of whom are women.
Prisons are overflowing with women charged with running away from abusive husbands and domestic violence. For them, jail is safer than home.
Up to 80% of Afghan girls are sold into forced marriages, some as young as seven years old. Yet we never hear a word of protest or condemnation from the ‘feminazis’ in America.
More suicides and mutilations caused by self-immolation and one courageous woman who survived 4 assassination attempts in her struggle for womens rights in Afghanistan. (WARNING: Graphic Images)
FREE SPEECH UNDER ATTACK IN CANADA, too: Pat Condell waxes poetic about the dhimmi human rights Stalinists who are bowing down and submitting to the will of Allah by caving in to the ‘legal terrorism’ coming out of political Islam.
…will their hearts and minds follow? Or just their heads?
Muslims comprise no more than 10% of the population of any country in Europe, yet one by one, the countries ofEurope are compromising their basic freedoms and human rights by caving in to the sensitivities and religious fanaticism of the Muslims, aided and abetted by left wing sympathizers.
Watch these to see what will happen in America if we don’t stop Islam from spreading here too.
Speak out against Islam and lose your life.
Try to integrate Muslims into the culture of Europe and lose your livelihood.
Stop complaining that there are TOO MANY MUSLIMS IN EUROPE and just BAN ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION. Period.
“I wonder how long before the first European woman is stoned to death for adultery? If that catches on, the result will be hardly anyone left in France.”
“In Europe, being called ISLAMOPHOBIC now is a compliment.” Nobody presents the bare naked truth about the creeping Islamization of Europe better than Pat Condell.
Multiculturalism in Great Britain means bending over backwards to appease Muslim extremists and then being told that Muslim areas are NO-GO for non-Muslims.
Palestinians threaten Europe with Muslim minority.
Since when are European Muslims a weapon? Threatening that European Muslims will use violence to get their wishes is a very dangerous double edged sword. Unless they want to be seen and treated as a foreign weapon, it is a threat that European Muslims should strongly reject.
A couple of warnings from the Palestinians.
First, from the PLO representative in the EU, Leila Shahid, regarding the compromise resolution accepted by the EU in Strasbourg. Shahid was concerned that the statement did not mention article 2 of the Euro-Mediterranean agreement with Israel, which states the relations between the two will be based on respect for human rights.
Shahid deplored the compromise, saying that “A watered down text feeds the violence of the citizens of Arab origins living in Europe. They have the impression that the same rules don’t apply to everybody when it comes to human rights.”
Leila Shahid on the war in Gaza
Leila Shahid, the Palestinian envoy to the EU, spoke on French TV about the dangers of the war in Gaza. It could destabilize the region, bring to a clash of civilizations and should especially concern Europe, given its own Muslim minority.
The second comes from Talal Nassar, the chief Hamas spokesman in Syria:
Mr Nassar warned that Europe’s Muslim population would not forget the EU’s lack of hard action.
“The European position through this was not good and effectively supported the Zionists,” he said. “They should understand that Europe will be the first to get damaged by the Islamic movements there. Revolutions always arise out of injustice.
“Now the Arabs see Europe as raising empty slogans while doing nothing on the ground. If these massacres had been done against animals Europe would have been upset about animal rights. When it is Arabs or Muslims being killed no one does anything.”
And eventually, a lot of Dutch people will be, too, because of it. Anti-radical Islam advocate, Geert Wilders, to be prosecuted for ‘inciting hatred.’
Yet all those Muslims who rioted and murdered in the streets of Amsterdam and throughout Europe, over the Danish cartoons, never will be. How long until the Muslim President Obama will do the same here?
The Dutch Public Prosecutor’s Office is set to trample free speech rights in its misguided quest to prosecute Right-wing politician, Geert Wilders, for inciting hatred, discrimination and insulting language concerning Islam and Muslims.
Really?
It’s going to be interesting to see how the Dutch court presents its case, given that Wilders has presented his case against Islam by referring exclusively to Islamic texts and the over response by the Muslim leadership concerning these texts. Islam is an ideology, it’s not a racial, ethnic group, simply an ideology, and what the Dutch court is trying to do, is to place an ideology above critique. We’ve seen that before, as the Soviet Union victimized those who dared to raise a voice about the wrongs inflicted on others by that dangerous ideology.
Dutch Public Prosecutor’s Office to try Geert Wilders for THOUGHT CRIME.
The Amsterdam court has ruled that the Public Prosecutor’s Office should after all prosecute the right-wing populist politician Geert Wilders for remarks about Muslims and Islam. The court found that there was a case of inciting hatred, discrimination and insulting language to answer. Earlier the Public Prosecutor decided not to proceed against Mr Wilders, which sparked numerous protests from organisations and individuals.
The court regarded Mr Wilders’ remarks as punishable in law in view of both their content and the manner of presentation. The judges characterized the presentation as comprising “one-sided, generalised phrasing characterised by a radical nature, constant repetition and increasing ferocity”. The court further ruled that the prosecution of the PVV party leader would not conflict with the right to freedom of expression.
Mr Wilders said it was “a black day for freedom of speech” and for himself. Although he was confident he would be exonerated, he was afraid the trial might last so long and cost the PVV so much that the future existence of the party would be jeopardized.
Geert Wilders talks about “Fitna,” the film Islam tried to have banned.
They upgraded their security and are thumbing their noses at the medieval morons: LiveLeak.com – Fitna the Movie: Geert Wilders’ film about the Quran (English). Kudos to LiveLeak for taking the kind of principled stand our mainstream media won’t.
FITNA’s filmmaker, Geert Wilders,’ life has been threatened by Muslims around the world and now he is facing arrest and trial by Islamic countries that want to silence him for good.
And the UK police can’t seem to do anything about it.
ISLAM SUPPORTS PIMPING. The Qur’an not only allows slavery and sex with captured women and slave girls, it says Allah may pardon those who forced their slave girls to sell their bodies.
Marnie Pearce, married to an Egyptian man, is facing 6 months in jail, deportation and loss of her 2 children for being accused (falsely, she says) of adultery. Could a stoning be far behind?
Of course under Shari’a Law, unless she has 4 male witnesses, her word is worth nothing. Then again, I would have to question the sanity of any Western woman marrying a man who lives under a 7th Century system of laws?
But the Nanny State police from the Attorney General’s office have their panties in a wad – NOT over the Triple Bypass Burgers but over the ‘NurseWaitresses.’
Israelis are demanding that the IDF continue the war until Hamas is totally defeated and kidnapped Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, is freed.
I guess they haven’t heard that it was the United States that insisted the fighting be stopped in time for the inauguration. Hopefully Washington will untie the IDF’s hands after the ‘messiah’ comes down from the mountain.
6 millions Jews and 1 million Arabs live in the state of Israel. In the “Palestinian” territories, many complain about Israeli “occupation”. But Israel is ready to give away Judea, Samaria and has already given away Gaza, hoping for peace. Problem is: when a Palestinian talks about “occupation” he means Tel Aviv… Not Ramallah or Jenin. They want to destroy Israel, and Israel will not let that happen.
The scenes from Gaza are heartbreaking. But the whole conflict could be avoided if the Palestinians said one small thing.
It was strictly forbidden to have a notebook in Belsen, but my Aunt Ruth had one anyway. Just a little pocket diary – an appointment book with one of those tiny pencils. And in it, in the autumn of 1944, she noted that Anne Frank and Anne’s sister, Ruth’s schoolfriend Margot, had arrived in the concentration camp. My mother and my aunt had been watching through the camp wire when the Franks arrived. Mum remembers it well, because they had been excited to spot girls they knew from the old days in Amsterdam. They had played in the same streets, been to the same schools and Ruth and Margot attended Hebrew classes together. The pair had once been pressed into service to act as bridesmaids, when a secretive Jewish wedding had taken place at the synagogue during their lesson time. But Ruth and Margot did not grow up together. Because while Ruth and my mother lived, Margot and Anne never left Belsen. They died of typhus.
I am telling you this story because I want you to understand Israel. Not to agree with all it does, not to keep quiet when you want to protest against its actions, not to side with it always, merely to understand Israel.There are two things about the tale that help to provide insight. The first is that all these things, the gas chambers, the concentration camps, the attempt to wipe Jews from the face of the Earth, they aren’t ancient history, and they aren’t fable. They happened to real people and they happened in our lifetime. Anne and Margot Frank were just children to my aunt and my mother; they weren’t icons, or symbols of anything.
The second is that world opinion weeps now for Anne Frank. But world opinion did not save her.
The origin of the state of Israel is not religion or nationalism, it is the experience of oppression and murder, the fear of total annihilation and the bitter conclusion that world opinion could not be relied upon to protect the Jews.
Israel was the idea of a journalist. Theodor Herzl was the Paris correspondent of the Neue Freie Presse when he witnessed anti-Semitic rioting against the Jewish army captain Alfred Dreyfus who had been falsely accused of espionage. Herzl was then among the small corps of journalists who in 1895 witnessed the famous ceremony of disgrace in which Dreyfus was stripped of his epaulettes.
The experience led Herzl to abandon his belief in assimilation. He became convinced that Jews would only be safe if they had their own national home. Herzl became the first leader of modern Zionism. For many years many Jews resisted Herzl’s conclusion. My grandfather was among them. But the experience of Jews all over the world in the first half of the 20th century – not just in Europe but in the Middle East too – rather bore out Herzl.
So when Israel is urged to respect world opinion and put its faith in the international community the point is rather being missed. The very idea of Israel is a rejection of this option. Israel only exists because Jews do not feel safe as the wards of world opinion. Zionism, that word that is so abused, so reviled, is founded on a determination that, at the end of the day, somehow the Jews will defend themselves and their fellow Jews from destruction. If world opinion was enough, there would be no Israel.
The poverty and the death and the despair among the Palestinians in Gaza moves me to tears. How can it not? Who can see pictures of children in a war zone or a slum street and not be angry and bewildered and driven to protest? And what is so appalling is that it is so unnecessary. For there can be peace and prosperity at the smallest of prices. The Palestinians need only say that they will allow Israel to exist in peace. They need only say this tiny thing, and mean it, and there is pretty much nothing they cannot have.
Yet they will not say it. And they will not mean it. For they do not want the Jews. Again and again – again and again – the Palestinians have been offered a nation state in a divided Palestine. And again and again they have turned the offer down, for it has always been more important to drive out the Jews than to have a Palestinian state. It is difficult sometimes to avoid the feeling that Hamas and Hezbollah don’t want to kill Jews because they hate Israel. They hate Israel because they want to kill Jews.
There cannot be peace until this changes. For Israel will not rely on airy guarantees and international gestures to defend it. At its very core, it will not. It will lay down its arms when the Jews are safe, but it will not do it until they are.
And if you reflect on it, doesn’t recent experience bear this out? Just as Herzl was borne out? A year or so back I met a teacher while I was on holiday and fell to talking with him about Israel. He was a nice man and all he wanted was for fighting to stop and to end the suffering of children. And he had a question for me.
Why, he asked, doesn’t Israel offer to give back the West Bank and Gaza? Why doesn’t it just let the Palestinians have a state there? If the Palestinians turned it down, he said, then at least liberal opinion would be on Israel’s side and would rally to its assistance.
So I patiently explained to this kind, good man that Israel had, at Camp David in 2000, made precisely this offer and that it had been rejected out of hand by Yassir Arafat, not even used as the basis for negotiation. I told him that Israel was no longer in Gaza, having withdrawn unilaterally and taken the settlers with it. The Palestinians had greeted this movement with suicide bombs and rockets. Yet the teacher, with all his compassion, wasn’t even aware of all this. And liberal opinion? Sad to relate, my new friend’s faith in it was misplaced. It has turned strongly against Israel.
Israel has made many mistakes. It has acted too aggressively on some occasions, has been too defensive on others. The country hasn’t always respected the human rights of its enemies as it should have done. What nation under such a threat would have avoided all errors?
But you know what? As Iran gets a nuclear weapon and so the potential for another Holocaust against the Jews and world opinion does nothing, I am not so sure that the errors of world opinion are so much to be preferred to the errors of Israel.
Recent Comments